No edit summary |
m (Change typo) |
||
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ |
+ | {{Browsebar}} |
+ | {{Guidepage}} |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <b>If your question is not included and answered in the following list, then please ADD the question to the list and we will get back to you as soon as we can.</b> |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Notice:''' We are currently redesigning this page. Please add as many questions as you can think of to improve the quality of this FAQ. |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==How...?== |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===...is this site different from Wikipedia?=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Answer:''' As the intended users of the Wiki are academics, professionals and students within Psychology, there is much greater potential for the articles and information to be of a higher standard than is the case in Wikipedia, due to a greater level of expertise. Another aim of the site is allow users of psychologic & psychiatric services to comment on their experiences in seperate discussion areas, linked to each article. |
||
+ | |||
+ | The completed Psychology Wiki is intended to have link every academic reference and paper, either on-site (elsewhere in the Psychology Wiki) or off-site (to external sources, eg. PubMed). This was the original intention of the internet, allowing scientists to quickly cross reference papers with their colleagues in related fields. |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===...can I contribute to this site?=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | '''Answer:''' There are three main ways in which you can contribute to this site, depending on your level of expertise. The following pages best explain how you can contribute: |
||
+ | * How to contribute as a [[How_can_I_help:_If_I_am_an_academic_or_practioner|Professional/Academic]]. |
||
+ | * How to contribute as a [[How_can_I_help:_If_I_am_a_trainee,_assistant_or_student|Student/Undergraduate/Trainee]]. |
||
+ | * How to contribute as a [[How_can_I_help:_If_I_am_a_user_of_psychology_services|User or relative of a user of Psychology/Psychiatric Services]]. |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===...can I Upload <b>.pdf</b> files to this site?=== |
||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | Put the name of the file on the site and a description of it with |
||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Why...?== |
||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
As it stands the site can be transferred over to another host if this is what we decide. It is fully backupable (if there is such a word) and the software to run it is free |
As it stands the site can be transferred over to another host if this is what we decide. It is fully backupable (if there is such a word) and the software to run it is free |
||
Line 18: | Line 56: | ||
* Its not clear to me but it may be that the national socities might feel that they couldn't recommend the site, support its growth etc, because it is a money making venture. |
* Its not clear to me but it may be that the national socities might feel that they couldn't recommend the site, support its growth etc, because it is a money making venture. |
||
− | + | ==I notice that some of the advertisements down the side of the page advertise for students to purchase essays. Can these be screened out?== |
|
− | + | '''ANSWER:''' I am in contact wih Wikicities about this and will post their reply as soon as I receive it [[User:Lifeartist|Lifeartist]] 14:41, 13 March 2006 (UTC). |
|
Angela Beesley's reply was straightforward: "If there are specific URLs causing problems, please email them to me and I can block them from appearing in the Google ads." So please notify her directly throught the 'report a problem' link on the left hand panel below the google search box. It would be useful to list the blocked links here so we can keep upto date with the notifications.[[User:Lifeartist|Lifeartist]] 09:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC). |
Angela Beesley's reply was straightforward: "If there are specific URLs causing problems, please email them to me and I can block them from appearing in the Google ads." So please notify her directly throught the 'report a problem' link on the left hand panel below the google search box. It would be useful to list the blocked links here so we can keep upto date with the notifications.[[User:Lifeartist|Lifeartist]] 09:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC). |
||
She has been notified and taken these ads off: |
She has been notified and taken these ads off: |
||
− | *www.essayfinder.com |
+ | *www.essayfinder.com |
*DueNow.com/Essays/ |
*DueNow.com/Essays/ |
||
*ExampleEssays.com |
*ExampleEssays.com |
||
Line 31: | Line 69: | ||
*www.directessays.com |
*www.directessays.com |
||
− | '''I would like to upload material of my own in the form of pdf files. How do I do this?''' |
||
− | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | ==What...?== |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===About Plagiarism?=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | ===About published work? Wont it be edited!!!?=== |
||
⚫ | |||
− | + | ===...Quality controls are there for content of the Psychology Information?=== |
|
− | + | '''ANSWER:''' Quality control is a clear issue if the site is to be a credible source of information for psychologists on a daily basis. |
|
− | That quality control is possible is demonstrated by a recent study in Nature which revealed that Wikipedia was more accurate that Encyclopedia Brittanica when judged by a sample of scientific articles. See: http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html. |
+ | That quality control is possible is demonstrated by a recent study in Nature which revealed that Wikipedia was more accurate that Encyclopedia Brittanica when judged by a sample of scientific articles. See: [http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html]. |
A number of factors can work to ensure quality. |
A number of factors can work to ensure quality. |
||
Line 51: | Line 88: | ||
*Peer review. In a sense articles on the Psychology Wiki are under continuous peer review . My own view is that quality is ensured by regular participation and vetting of content by all of us as a profession. With a 1000 contributers each taking responsibility for their areas of expertise we can monitor the content. There are elements such as the [[watchlist]] and [[Help:Recent_changes | recent changes]] pages that allow us to do this. Each page has a discussion page were debates about the quality of content can be had to resolve disputes and each registered user has their own Talk page here they can be contacted and educated about the error of their ways. |
*Peer review. In a sense articles on the Psychology Wiki are under continuous peer review . My own view is that quality is ensured by regular participation and vetting of content by all of us as a profession. With a 1000 contributers each taking responsibility for their areas of expertise we can monitor the content. There are elements such as the [[watchlist]] and [[Help:Recent_changes | recent changes]] pages that allow us to do this. Each page has a discussion page were debates about the quality of content can be had to resolve disputes and each registered user has their own Talk page here they can be contacted and educated about the error of their ways. |
||
− | *I know people have concern about vandalism on the site, which would include for us, people putting up low quality articles, degrading the quality of what was already posted. Our current thoughts on the potential efficacy of our procedures are here [[Site vandalism | here]]. |
+ | *I know people have concern about vandalism on the site, which would include, for us, people putting up low quality articles, degrading the quality of what was already posted. Our current thoughts on the potential efficacy of our procedures are here [[Site vandalism | here]]. |
− | + | ===...are these adverts down the side of the page? I want reassurance you are not an Ad farm copying material from Wikipedia=== |
|
− | We are always happy to reassure that we are the genuine article.You are not the first to raise the issue.You can see some of our responses to these concerns in the first answer above. |
+ | '''ANSWER:''' We are always happy to reassure that we are the genuine article.You are not the first to raise the issue.You can see some of our responses to these concerns in the first answer above. |
− | Wikia is a company set up by the founders of Wikipedia on the basis of an advertising finance model They provide the facilities for the site but we as founder and contributors are |
+ | Wikia is a company set up by the founders of Wikipedia on the basis of an advertising finance model They provide the facilities for the site but we as founder and contributors are separate from them and have no financial interest in the site. |
Our aim has been to work towards a site for professional, academics and users of our services. So in addition to generating original material eg[http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Professional_ethics] Our strategy has been to structure the site with WP articles with a view to upgrading them from general reader focus to a professional academic standard. |
Our aim has been to work towards a site for professional, academics and users of our services. So in addition to generating original material eg[http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Professional_ethics] Our strategy has been to structure the site with WP articles with a view to upgrading them from general reader focus to a professional academic standard. |
Latest revision as of 20:58, 29 September 2009
Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
|