Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
Programmed instruction is the name of the technology invented by the behaviorist B.F. Skinner to improve teaching. It was based on his theory of Verbal Behavior as a means to accelerate and increase conventional educational learning.
Programmed Instruction[edit | edit source]
It typically consists of self-teaching with the aid of a specialized textbook or teaching machine that presents material structured in a logical and empirically developed sequence or sequences. Programmed instruction may be presented by a teacher to as well and it has been argued that the principles of Programmed Instruction can improve classic lectures and textbooks. Programmed instruction allows students to progress through a unit of study at their own rate, checking their own answers and advancing only after answering correctly. In one simplified form of PI, after each step, they are presented with a question to test their comprehension, then are immediately shown the correct answer or given additional information. However the objective of the instructional programming is to present the material in very small increments. The more sophisticated forms of programmed instruction may have the questions or tasks programmed well enough that the presentation and test model--an extropolation from traditional and classical instruction is not necessarily utilized.
Programmed Learning[edit | edit source]
This idea was later adapted by Robert M. Gagné, who invented programmed learning for use in teaching in schools. The difference between programmed instruction (PI) and programmed learning (PL) is that PI is intended to modify behavior, whereas PL is used for teaching facts and skills.
Personalized System of Instruction[edit | edit source]
Errorless Discrimination[edit | edit source]
Programmed instruction is through early efforts to implement Skinner's basic research findings on learning at Harvard that caused errorless discrimination techniques to be developed. Programmed instruction had some early success in aphasia rehabilation .
Programmed instruction today[edit | edit source]
While not as popular, programmed instruction continues to be used today. Recently, the application of programmed instruction principles was applied to training in computer programs   and combined with Benjamin Bloom's taxonomy to teach college students . Some have argued that there is a resurgence of research on programmed instruction due to use of computers and the internet. 
See also[edit | edit source]
- Computer assisted instruction
- Individualized instruction
- Programmed textbooks
- Teaching machines
[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- Lewis D. Eigen, Research Paper Number 1, Report of the Center for Programed Instruction, CPS, New York, 1959
- Stuart Margulies and Lewis D. Eigen, Applied Programmed Instruction, John Wiley & Sons, 1961
- Keller FS (1968). "Good-bye, teacher...". J Appl Behav Anal 1 (1): 79–89.
- Terrace HS (January 1963). Discrimination learning with and without "errors". J Exp Anal Behav 6: 1–27.
- Skinner, B.F. (1968) Technology of Teaching, index
- Goldfarb R (2006). Operant Conditioning and Programmed Instruction in Aphasia Rehabilitation. SLP-ABA 1 (1): 56–64.
- Emurian HH (2007). Programmed Instruction for Teaching Java: Consideration of Learn Unit Frequency and Rule-Test Performance. The Behavior Analyst Today 8 (1): 70–88.
- Emurian, H.H. (2009). Teaching Java: Managing Instructional Tactics to Optimize Student Learning. International Journal of Information & Communication Technology Education, 3(4), 34-49
- Emurian, H.H., Holden, H.K., & Abarbanel, R.A. (2008). Managing Programmed Instruction and Collaborative Peer Tutoring in the Classroom: Applications in Teaching Java. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 576 - 614.
- Crone-Todd, D. F. & Pear, J.J. (2001) Application of Bloom's Taxonomy to PSI. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2 (3), 204 -215.BAO
- Eyre HL (2007). Keller’s Personalized System of Instruction: Was it a Fleeting Fancy or is there a Revival on the Horizon?. The Behavior Analyst Today 8 (3): 317–24.
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|