Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Biological: Behavioural genetics · Evolutionary psychology · Neuroanatomy · Neurochemistry · Neuroendocrinology · Neuroscience · Psychoneuroimmunology · Physiological Psychology · Psychopharmacology (Index, Outline)

Neuroblastoma rosettes.jpg|
Neuroblastoma, NOS
ICD-10 C749
ICD-9 194.0
OMIM 256700
DiseasesDB 8935
MedlinePlus 001408
eMedicine med/2836 ped/1570
MeSH {{{MeshNumber}}}

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid cancer in childhood and the most common cancer in infancy, with an annual incidence of about 650 new cases per year in the US.[1] Close to 50 percent of neuroblastoma cases occur in children younger than two years old.[2] It is a neuroendocrine tumor, arising from any neural crest element of the sympathetic nervous system or SNS. It most frequently originates in one of the adrenal glands, but can also develop in nerve tissues in the neck, chest, abdomen, or pelvis.

Neuroblastoma is one of the few human malignancies known to demonstrate spontaneous regression from an undifferentiated state to a completely benign cellular appearance.[3]

A disease exhibiting extreme heterogeneity, neuroblastoma is stratified into three risk categories: low, intermediate, and high risk. Low-risk disease is most common in infants and highly curable with observation only or surgery, whereas high-risk disease is difficult to cure even with the most intensive multi-modal therapies available.[4]

Note: Esthesioneuroblastoma, also known as olfactory neuroblastoma, is believed to arise from the olfactory epithelium and its classification remains controversial. However, since it is not a sympathetic nervous system malignancy it is a distinct clinical entity and is not to be confused with neuroblastoma.[5][6]

Classification[edit | edit source]

The "International Neuroblastoma Staging System" (INSS) established in 1986 and revised in 1988 stratifies neuroblastoma according to its anatomical presence at diagnosis:[7][8][9]

  • Stage 1: Localized tumor confined to the area of origin.
  • Stage 2A: Unilateral tumor with incomplete gross resection; identifiable ipsilateral and contralateral lymph node negative for tumor.
  • Stage 2B: Unilateral tumor with complete or incomplete gross resection; with ipsilateral lymph node positive for tumor; identifiable contralateral lymph node negative for tumor.
  • Stage 3: Tumor infiltrating across midline with or without regional lymph node involvement; or unilateral tumor with contralateral lymph node involvement; or midline tumor with bilateral lymph node involvement.
  • Stage 4: Dissemination of tumor to distant lymph nodes, bone marrow, bone, liver, or other organs except as defined by Stage 4S.
  • Stage 4S: Age <1 year old with localized primary tumor as defined in Stage 1 or 2, with dissemination limited to liver, skin, or bone marrow (less than 10 percent of nucleated bone marrow cells are tumors).

Although international agreement on staging (INSS) has been used, the need for an international consensus on risk assignment has also been recognized in order to compare similar cohorts in results of studies. Beginning in 2005, representatives of the major pediatric oncology cooperative groups have met to review data for 8,800 neuroblastoma patients treated in Europe, Japan, USA, Canada, and Australia between 1990 and 2002. This task force has proposed the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system. Retrospective studies revealed the high survival rate of 12-18 month old age group, previously categorized as high-risk, and prompted the decision to reclassify 12-18 month old children without N-myc (also commonly referred to as MYCN) amplification to intermediate risk category.[10]

The new INRG risk assignment will classify neuroblastoma at diagnosis based on a new International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System (INRGSS):

  • Stage L1: Localized disease without image-defined risk factors.
  • Stage L2: Localized disease with image-defined risk factors.
  • Stage M: Metastatic disease.
  • Stage MS: Metastatic disease "special" where MS is equivalent to stage 4S.

The new risk stratification will be based on the new INRGSS staging system, age (dichotomized at 18 months), tumor grade, N-myc amplification, unbalanced 11q aberration, and ploidy into four pre-treatment risk groups: very low, low, intermediate, and high risk.[11][12]

Signs and symptoms[edit | edit source]

The first symptoms of neuroblastoma are often vague making diagnosis difficult. Fatigue, loss of appetite, fever, and joint pain are common. Symptoms depend on primary tumor locations and metastases if present:[13]

Neuroblastoma often spreads to other parts of the body before any symptoms are apparent and 50 to 60% of all neuroblastoma cases present with metastases.[14]

The most common location for neuroblastoma to originate (ie the primary tumor) is on the adrenal glands. This occurs in 40% of localized tumors and in 60% of cases of widespread disease. Neuroblastoma can also develop anywhere along the sympathetic nervous system chain from the neck to the pelvis. Frequencies in different locations include: neck (1%), chest (19%), abdomen (30% non-adrenal), or pelvis (1%). In rare cases, no primary tumor can be discerned.[15]

Rare but characteristic presentations include transverse myelopathy (tumor spinal cord compression, 5% of cases), treatment-resistant diarrhea (tumor vasoactive intestinal peptide secretion, 4% of cases), Horner's syndrome (cervical tumor, 2.4% of cases), opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome[16] and ataxia (suspected paraneoplastic cause, 1.3% of cases), and hypertension (catecholamine secretion or renal artery compression, 1.3% of cases).[17]

Cause[edit | edit source]

The etiology of neuroblastoma is not well understood. Certain cases however do run in families and have been linked to genetics. Familial neuroblastoma is cased by a very rare germline mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene.[18]

Several risk factors have been proposed and are the subject of ongoing research. Due to characteristic early onset many studies have focused on parental factors around conception and during gestation. Factors investigated have included occupation (i.e. exposure to chemicals in specific industries), smoking, alcohol consumption, use of medicinal drugs during pregnancy and birth factors; however, results have been inconclusive.[19]

Other studies have examined possible links with atopy and exposure to infection early in life,[20] use of hormones and fertility drugs,[21] and maternal use of hair dye.[22][23]

Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

File:Neuroblastoma mets.JPG

MRI showing orbital and skull vault metastatic NB in 2 year old

The diagnosis is usually confirmed by a surgical pathologist, taking into account the clinical presentation, microscopic findings, and other laboratory tests.

Serology[edit | edit source]

In about 90% of cases of neuroblastoma, elevated levels of catecholamines or its metabolites are found in the urine or blood. Catecholamines and their metabolites include dopamine, homovanillic acid (HVA), and/or vanillylmandelic acid (VMA).[24]

Imaging[edit | edit source]

Another way to detect neuroblastoma is the mIBG scan (meta-iodobenzylguanidine), which is taken up by 90 to 95% of all neuroblastomas, often termed "mIBG-avid."[25] The mechanism is that mIBG is taken up by sympathetic neurons, and is a functioning analog of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine. When it is radio-ionated with I-131 or I-123 (radioactive iodine isotopes), it is a very good radiopharmaceutical for diagnosis and monitoring of response to treatment for this disease. With a half-life of 13 hours, I-123 is the preferred isotope for imaging sensitivity and quality. I-131 has a half-life of 8 days and at higher doses is an effective therapy as targeted radiation against relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma.[26]

Histology[edit | edit source]


microscopic view of stroma-rich ganglioneuroblastoma

On microscopy, the tumor cells are typically described as small, round and blue, and rosette patterns (Homer-Wright pseudo-rosettes) may be seen.[27] A variety of immunohistochemical stains are used by pathologists to distinguish neuroblastomas from histological mimics, such as rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, lymphoma and Wilms' tumor. In February 2007, Althea Technologies announced the development of a molecular diagnostic capable of clearly differentiating various types of childhood cancers, developed in cooperation with the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI).[28]

Neuroblastoma is one of the peripheral neuroblastic tumors (pNTs) that have similar origins and show a wide pattern of differentiation ranging from benign ganglioneuroma to stroma-rich ganglioneuroblastoma with neuroblastic cells intermixed or in nodules, to highly malignant neuroblastoma. This distinction in the pre-treatment tumor pathology is an important prognostic factor, along with age and mitosis-karyorrhexis index (MKI). This pathology classification system describes "favorable" and "unfavorable" tumors by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee (INPC, also called Shimada system) which was established in 1999 and revised in 2003.[29]

Screening[edit | edit source]

Urine catecholamine level can be elevated in pre-clinical neuroblastoma. Screening asymptomatic infants at three weeks, six months, and one year has been performed in Japan, Canada, and Germany since the 1980s.[30][31] Japan began screening six-month olds for neuroblastoma via analysis of the levels of homovanillic acid and vanilmandelic acid in 1984. Screening was halted in 2004 after studies in Canada and Germany showed no reduction in deaths due to neuroblastoma, but rather caused an increase in diagnoses that would have disappeared without treatment, subjecting those infants to unnecessary surgery and chemotherapy.[32][33] [34]

Treatment[edit | edit source]

When the lesion is localized, it is generally curable. However, long-term survival for children with advanced disease older than 18 months of age is poor despite aggressive multimodal therapy (intensive chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, stem cell transplant, differentiation agent isotretinoin also called 13-cis-retinoic acid, and frequently immunotherapy[35] with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody therapy).

Biologic and genetic characteristics have been identified, which, when added to classic clinical staging, has allowed patient assignment to risk groups for planning treatment intensity.[36] These criteria include the age of the patient, extent of disease spread, microscopic appearance, and genetic features including DNA ploidy and N-myc oncogene amplification (N-myc regulates microRNAs[37]), into low, intermediate, and high risk disease. A recent biology study (COG ANBL00B1) analyzed 2687 neuroblastoma patients and the spectrum of risk assignment was determined: 37% of neuroblastoma cases are low risk, 18% are intermediate risk, and 45% are high risk.[38] (There is some evidence that the high- and low-risk types are caused by different mechanisms, and are not merely two different degrees of expression of the same mechanism.)[39]

The therapies for these different risk categories are very different.

With current treatments, patients with low and intermediate risk disease have an excellent prognosis with cure rates above 90% for low risk and 70%-90% for intermediate risk. In contrast, therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma the past two decades resulted in cures only about 30% of the time.[43] The addition of antibody therapy has raised survival rates for high-risk disease significantly. In March 2009 an early analysis of a Children's Oncology Group (COG) study with 226 high-risk patients showed that two years after stem cell transplant 66% of the group randomized to received ch14.18 antibody with GM-CSF and IL-2 were alive and disease-free compared to only 46% in the group that did not receive the antibody. The randomization was stopped so all patients enrolling on the trial will receive the antibody therapy.[44]

Chemotherapy agents used in combination have been found to be effective against neuroblastoma. Agents commonly used in induction and for stem cell transplant conditioning are platinum compounds (cisplatin, carboplatin), alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, melphalan), topoisomerase II inhibitor (etoposide), anthracycline antibiotics (doxorubicin) and vinca alkaloids (vincristine). Some newer regimens include topoisomerase I inhibitors (topotecan and irinotecan) in induction which have been found to be effective against recurrent disease.

Prognosis[edit | edit source]

Between 20% and 50% of high-risk cases do not respond adequately to induction high-dose chemotherapy and are progressive or refractory.[45][46] Relapse after completion of frontline therapy is also common. Further treatment is available in phase I and phase II clinical trials that test new agents and combinations of agents against neuroblastoma, but the outcome remains very poor for relapsed high-risk disease.[47]

Most long-term survivors alive today had low or intermediate risk disease and milder courses of treatment compared to high-risk disease. The majority of survivors have long-term effects from the treatment. Survivors of intermediate and high-risk treatment often experience hearing loss. Growth reduction, thyroid function disorders, learning difficulties, and greater risk of secondary cancers affect survivors of high-risk disease.[48][49] An estimated two of three survivors of childhood cancer will ultimately develop at least one chronic and sometimes life-threatening health problem within 20 to 30 years after the cancer diagnosis.[50][51] These results were confirmed in a National Cancer Institute publication released July 2009 comparing outcomes of neuroblastoma survivors to siblings. The study reported that survivors are more likely than siblings to develop chronic neurological, sensory, endocrine, and musculoskeletal complications and less likely to be married or have a high income job.[52]

Cytogenetic Profiles[edit | edit source]

Based on a series of 493 neuroblastoma samples, it has been reported that overall genomic pattern, as tested by array-based karyotyping, is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma[53]:

  • Tumors presenting exclusively with whole chromosome copy number changes were associated with excellent survival.
  • Tumors presenting with any kind of segmental chromosome copy number changes were associated with a high risk of relapse.
  • Within tumors showing segmental alterations, additional independent predictors of decreased overall survival were N-myc amplification, 1p and 11q deletions, and 1q gain.

Earlier publications categorized neuroblastomas into three major subtypes based on cytogenetic profiles[54]:

  • Subtype 1: favorable neuroblastoma with near triploidy and a predominance of numerical gains and losses, mostly representing non-metastatic NB stages 1, 2 and 4S.
  • Subtypes 2A and 2B: found in unfavorable widespread neuroblastoma, stages 3 and 4, with 11q loss and 17q gain without N-myc amplification (subtype 2A) or with N-myc amplification often together with 1p deletions and 17q gain (subtype 2B).

Virtual karyotyping can be performed on fresh or paraffin-embedded tumors to assess copy number at these loci. SNP array virtual karyotyping is preferred for tumor samples, including neuroblastomas, because they can detect copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (acquired uniparental disomy). Copy neutral LOH can be biologically equivalent to a deletion and has been detected at key loci in neuroblastoma.[55] ArrayCGH, FISH, or conventional cytogenetics cannot detect copy neutral LOH.

Epidemiology[edit | edit source]

Neuroblastoma comprises 6-10% of all childhood cancers, and 15% of cancer deaths in children. The annual mortality rate is 10 per million children in the 0- to 4-year-old age group, and 4 per million in the 4- to 9-year old age group.[56]

The highest incidence is in the first year of life, and some cases are congenital. The age range is broad, including older children and adults,[57] but only 10% of cases occur in people older than 5 years of age.[25] A large European study reported less than 2% of over 4000 neuroblastoma cases were over 18 years old.[58]

History[edit | edit source]

File:Rudolf Virchow.jpg

Rudolf Virchow; the first to describe an abdominal tumor in a child as a "glioma"

In 1864 German physician Rudolf Virchow was the first to describe an abdominal tumor in a child as a "glioma". The characteristics of tumors from the sympathetic nervous system and the adrenal medulla when than noted in 1891 by German pathologist Felix Marchand.[59] [60] In 1901 the distinctive presentation of stage 4S in infants (liver but no bone metastases) was described by William Pepper. In 1910 James Homer Wright understood the tumor to originate from primitive neural cells, and named it neuroblastoma. He also noted the circular clumps of cells in bone marrow samples which are now termed "Homer-Wright pseudorosettes."[61]

Research[edit | edit source]

New frontline treatments[edit | edit source]

Recent focus has been to reduce therapy for low and intermediate risk neuroblastoma while maintaining survival rates at 90%.[62] A study of 467 intermediate risk patients enrolled in A3961 from 1997 to 2005 confirmed the hypothesis that therapy could be successfully reduced for this risk group. Those with favorable characteristics (tumor grade and response) received four cycles of chemotherapy, and those with unfavorable characteristics received eight cycles, with three-year event free survival and overall survival stable at 90% for the entire cohort. Future plans are to intensify treatment for those patients with aberration of 1p36 or 11q23 chromosomes as well as for those who lack early response to treatment.[63]

By contrast, focus the past 20 years or more has been to intensify treatment for high-risk neuroblastoma. Chemotherapy induction variations, timing of surgery, stem cell transplant regimens, various delivery schemes for radiation, and use of monoclonal antibodies and retinoids to treat minimal residual disease continue to be examined. Recent phase III clinical trials with randomization have been carried out to answer these questions to improve survival of high-risk disease:

  • 1982-1985: European Neuroblastoma Study Group (ENSG1) enrolled 167 children and randomized to melphalan autologous bone marrow transplant or no further therapy (no radiation therapy given to any). Transplant and no-transplant arms each had 65 patients, and recent long-term follow-up report revealed significantly better 5 year event-free survival for stage 4 over 1 year old in melphalan-transplant group versus no further treatment: 33% versus 17% respectively.[64]
  • 1990-1999: European study (EU-20592 or CCLGNB-1990-11) randomized 262 high-risk children over 1 year old and revealed higher survival rate for rapid sequence induction (10-day cycle) versus standard induction (21-day cycle) with same total dose. Ten-year event free survival was 27% and 18% respectively with non-aggressive surgical approach, no radiotherapy, and melphalan-only autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplant for both groups.[65]
  • 1991-1996: Phase III trial with two sequential randomizations for 379 high-risk NB patients was carried out by the Children's Cancer Group (CCG-3891) which demonstrated improved survival with myeloablative therapy (with total body irradiation) and 13-cis-retinoic acid (Accutane) with 50 patients in each of the four arms of the study.[66],[67]
  • 1996-2003: The German (GPOH) study NB97 compared outcomes of 295 high-risk NB patients randomized for stem cell transplant or consolidation chemotherapy. Results showed increased survival with transplant.[68]
  • 2000-2006: The recent study (COG-A3973)[69] questioned the need for purged stem cells for CEM-LI (carboplatin, etoposide, melphalan, with local irradiation)[70] transplant, and accrued 486 patients. Purging stem cells was not found to improve survival[46]
  • 2000-2012: A concurrent study (COG-ANBL0032)[71] determined in early review that the antibody ch14.18 with interleukin 2 and GMCSF (studied retrospectively in German GPOH NB90 and NB 97 at a lower dose and without cytokines[72]) improved survival, and will accrue a total of 423 patients.[73]
  • 2002-2008: SIOP (International Society of Paediatric Oncology) formed the European SIOP Neuroblastoma Group (ESIOP NB) in 1994 [74] and activated a phase III high-risk NB protocol in 2002 (SIOP-EUROPE-HR-NBL-1) [75] using “rapid” COJEC (8 cycles of chemotherapy given at 10-day intervals) followed by transplant randomization to CEM (carboplatin, etoposide, melphalan) or BuMel (busulfan, melphalan) and then randomization to with or without ch14.18 antibody treatment. This study will evaluate the use of growth factors as well as compare transplant regimens, with or without ch14.18 antibody, and all patients receive retinoic acid. This trial will accrue 1000 patients (175 per year). There are eight arms to this study.
  • 2005-2010: The current German NB2004 [76] randomization will include MIBG therapy and randomize topotecan use in up-front therapy and will accrue a total of 642 for all risk groups (roughly half will be high-risk). After transplant, the high-risk protocol includes six months of cis-retinoic acid, a three month break, and another three months of retinoic acid.
  • 2007: The COG phase III ANBL0532 [77] trial opened December 2007 for accrual of 495 and will compare single versus tandem transplants, and induction begins with two cycles of topotecan.[78]

In addition to these phase III studies, research institutions such as Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, Tennessee), and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York offer unique treatment protocols. Texas Children's uses a novel induction regimen which includes a method of giving chemotherapy called “chemo-switching” where cisplatin is given as high-dose pulse and etoposide is given at low-dose over several weeks for the first two cycles.[79] St Jude's recently finished (2007) testing a new up-front chemotherapy regimen in 23 children which included irinotecan and gefitinib with 16 months of maintenance chemotherapy after stem cell transplant with alternating oral 13-cis-retinoic acid and topotecan.[80] In December 2008 St Jude's opened a new trial using temsirolimus and irinotecan in induction.[81] Sloan-Kettering offers treatment that includes a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody, 3F8, used in protocols since the mid 1980s. This antibody is used for treating minimal residual disease or consolidation instead of stem cell transplant.[82]

Refractory and relapsed neuroblastoma[edit | edit source]


microscopic view of a NB cell line (SH-SY5Y) used in preclinical research for testing new agents

Some children (particularly in high-risk cases) do not respond completely to frontline treatment (with a complete response or very good partial response) and are labeled refractory. These children are removed from the frontline therapy (clinical trial) and are eligible for clinical trials using new therapies. Many high-risk children have a good response to frontline therapy and achieve a remission, but later the disease recurs (relapse). These children are also eligible for new therapies being tested in clinical trials. The protein p53 is believed to play a role in the development of resistance to chemotherapy.[83]

Chemotherapy with topotecan and cyclophosphamide is frequently used in refractory setting and after relapse. A randomized study (2004) with 119 patients (comparing topotecan alone to topotecan and cyclophosphamide) revealed a 31% complete or partial response rate with two-year progression-free survival at 36% in the topotecan and cyclophosphamide group.[84] Irinotecan (intravenous or oral) and oral temozolomide are also used in refractory and recurrent neuroblastoma.[85][86]

Many phase I and phase II trials are currently testing new agents against neuroblastoma in children who have relapsed or are resistant to initial therapy. Investigators are studying targeted therapy, anti-angiogenesis agents, and new monoclonal antibodies such as hu14.18-IL2.

In November 2006, DRAXIS Health received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to run two clinical trials using radioactive Iobenguane I-131 Injection (I-131 MIBG) to treat high-risk neuroblastoma[87] and in May 2008 Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals announced the opening of a Phase IIa trial of Azedra, the I-131 MIBG molecule radiolabeled using Molecular Insight's proprietary Ultratrace technology, which removes unnecessary nonradioactive molecules, effectively concentrating radiation in the neuroblastoma tumor cells.[88][89][90] These trials are coordinated by a group of 11 children’s hospitals and two universities in the United States known as the New Advances in Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) consortium, and are continuations of earlier NANT studies. The NANT consortium is also currently offering trials using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor CEP-701 (lestaurtinib), new oral powder formulation of fenretinide, intravenous fenretinide, and bisphosphonate (Zometa).[91]

In February 2007, a study in Sweden reported that a common painkiller might inhibit the development of neuroblastoma and help make treatment of the disease more effective. Celecoxib, an analgesic, anti-inflammatory agent that inhibits the inflammatory enzyme Cox-2 which is required for neuroblastoma cells growth and proliferation. Clinical studies are now planned; research to date has been done only in animals and cell cultures.[92][93]

A November 2009 study in mice shows that activating the tumor suppressor p53 with a new drug, nutlin-3, may slow tumor growth.[94]. In this study, physician Tom Van Maerken of Ghent University Hospital in Belgium and his colleagues used nutlin-3 to neutralize MDM2, a protein that binds to the p53 protein and obstructs p53’s ability to trigger programmed cell death. Earlier studies have shown that nutlin-3 can specifically prevent MDM2 from disabling p53.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. eMedicine - Neuroblastoma : Article by Norman J Lacayo, MD. URL accessed on 2008-07-30.
  2. Janet Sassi, "Cellular Communication: Unraveling the Secrets of Histone Proteins", Fordham University, February 16, 2007
  3. Bénard J, Raguénez G, Kauffmann A, et al. (October 2008). MYCN-non-amplified metastatic neuroblastoma with good prognosis and spontaneous regression: a molecular portrait of stage 4S. Mol Oncol 2 (3): 261–71.
  4. ScienceDirect - The Lancet : Neuroblastoma.
  5. eMedicine - Esthesioneuroblastoma : Article by Pavel Dulguerov, MD. URL accessed on 2008-07-30.
  6. Cheung, Nai-Kong (2005). Neuroblastoma, Springer-Verlag.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Neuroblastoma Treatment - National Cancer Institute. URL accessed on 2008-07-30. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "titleNeuroblastoma Treatment - National Cancer Institute" defined multiple times with different content
  8. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, et al. (1988). International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 6 (12): 1874–81.
  9. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. (1993). Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 11 (8): 1466–77.
  10. Schmidt ML, Lal A, Seeger RC, Maris JM, Shimada H, O'Leary M, Gerbing RB, Matthay KK (2005). Favorable prognosis for patients 12 to 18 months of age with stage 4 nonamplified MYCN neuroblastoma: a Children's Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol 23 (27): 6474–80.
  11. Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL (2007). Neuroblastoma. Lancet 369 (9579): 2106–20.
  12. Cohn SL, London WB, Monclair T, Matthay KK, Ambros PF, Pearson AD, for the INRG Working Group (2007). Update on the development of the international neuroblastoma risk group (INRG) classification schema. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 25 (18S).
  13. Neuroblastoma in children : Cancerbackup. URL accessed on 2008-01-01.
  14. Neuroblastoma: Pediatric Cancers: Merck Manual Professional. URL accessed on 2008-01-01.
  15. Friedman GK, Castleberry RP (December 2007). Changing trends of research and treatment in infant neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 49 (7 Suppl): 1060–5.
  16. Rothenberg AB, Berdon WE, D'Angio GJ, Yamashiro DJ, Cowles RA (July 2009). The association between neuroblastoma and opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome: a historical review. Pediatr Radiol 39 (7): 723–6.
  17. Cheung, Nai-Kong (2005). Neuroblastoma, Springer-Verlag.
  18. Mossé YP, Laudenslager M, Longo L, et al. (October 2008). Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature 455 (7215): 930–5.
  19. Olshan, AF, Bunin, GR (2000) Epidemiology of Neuroblastoma. In: Brodeur, GM, Sawada, T, Tsuchida, Y, Voute, PA eds. , Neuroblastoma, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 33-39. ISBN 044450222X [1]
  20. Menegaux F, Olshan AF, Neglia JP, Pollock BH, Bondy ML (May 2004). Day care, childhood infections, and risk of neuroblastoma. Am. J. Epidemiol. 159 (9): 843–51.
  21. Olshan AF,et al. "Hormone and Fertility Drug Use and the Risk of Neuroblastoma: A Report from the Children's Cancer Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group", Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:930-8.
  22. ,McCall EE,et al. "Maternal hair dye use and risk of neuroblastoma in offspring", Cancer Causes and Control 2005; 16,6:743-8
  23. Heck JE, Ritz B, Hung RJ, Hashibe M, Boffetta P (March 2009). The epidemiology of neuroblastoma: a review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 23 (2): 125–43.
  24. Strenger V, Kerbl R, Dornbusch HJ, et al. (2007). Diagnostic and prognostic impact of urinary catecholamines in neuroblastoma patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48 (5): 504–9.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Howman-Giles R, Shaw PJ, Uren RF, Chung DK (2007). Neuroblastoma and other neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med 37 (4): 286–302.
  26. Pashankar F,O’Dorisio M, Menda Y (2005). MIBG and somatostatin receptor analogs in children: current concepts on diagnostic and therapeutic use. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 46 (1 (suppl)): 55S–61S.
  27. Miura K, Mineta H, Yokota N, Tsutsui Y (2001). Olfactory neuroblastoma with epithelial and endocrine differentiation transformed into ganglioneuroma after chemoradiotherapy. Pathol. Int. 51 (12): 942–7.
  28. "Althea Technologies Announces the Development of a Diagnostic Capable of Differentiating Multiple Forms of Childhood Cancer", press release, February 20, 2007
  29. Peuchmaur M, d'Amore ES, Joshi VV, et al. (2003). Revision of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification: confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular. Cancer 98 (10): 2274–81.
  30. Woods WG, Gao RN, Shuster JJ, et al. (2002). Screening of infants and mortality due to neuroblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 346 (14): 1041–6.
  31. Schilling FH, Spix C, Berthold F, et al. (2003). Children may not benefit from neuroblastoma screening at 1 year of age. Updated results of the population based controlled trial in Germany. Cancer Lett. 197 (1-2): 19–28.
  32. Tsubono Y, Hisamichi S (2004). A halt to neuroblastoma screening in Japan. N. Engl. J. Med. 350 (19): 2010–1.
  33. Neuroblastoma Screening - National Cancer Institute. URL accessed on 2008-07-30.
  34. Darshak Sanghavi, "Screen Alert: How an Ounce of RX Prevention can Cause a Pound of Hurt", Slate magazine, November 28, 2006
  35. Johnson E, Dean SM, Sondel PM (2007). Antibody-based immunotherapy in high-risk neuroblastoma. Expert Rev Mol Med 9 (34): 1–21.
  36. Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Brodeur GM. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2003 Mar;3(3):203-16. PMID 12612655
  37. Schulte JH, Horn S, Otto T, et al. (2008). MYCN regulates oncogenic MicroRNAs in neuroblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 122 (3): 699–704.
  38. Translating Neuroblastoma Genomics to the Clinic - J. Maris presentation ASCO 2007. URL accessed on 2008-01-13.
  39. Gisselsson D, Lundberg G, Ora I, Höglund M (2007). Distinct evolutionary mechanisms for genomic imbalances in high-risk and low-risk neuroblastomas. J Carcinog 6: 15.
  40. Haase GM, Perez C, Atkinson JB (1999). Current aspects of biology, risk assessment, and treatment of neuroblastoma. Semin Surg Oncol 16 (2): 91–104.
  41. Fish JD, Grupp SA (2007). Stem cell transplantation for neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 41: 159.
  42. Matthay KK, Villablanca JG, Seeger RC, et al. (1999). Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Children's Cancer Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (16): 1165–73.
  43. Neuroblastoma Treatment - National Cancer Institute. URL accessed on 2008-07-30.
  44. A phase III randomized trial of the chimeric anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18 with GM-CSF and IL2 as immunotherapy following dose intensive chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma: Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study ANBL0032.
  45. Reduction From Seven to Five Cycles of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy in Children With High-Risk Neuroblastoma -- Kushner et al. 22 (24): 4888 -- Journal of Clinical Oncology.
  46. 46.0 46.1 Response and toxicity to a dose-intensive multi-agent chemotherapy induction regimen for high risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB): A Children's Oncology Group (COG A3973) study. - ASCO. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  47. Ceschel S, Casotto V, Valsecchi MG, et al. (Oct 2006). Survival after relapse in children with solid tumors: a follow-up study from the Italian off-therapy registry. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47 (5): 560–6.
  48. Gurney JG, Tersak JM, Ness KK, Landier W, Matthay KK, Schmidt ML (2007). Hearing loss, quality of life, and academic problems in long-term neuroblastoma survivors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatrics 120 (5): e1229–36.
  49. Trahair TN, Vowels MR, Johnston K, Cohn RJ, Russell SJ, Neville KA, Carroll S, Marshall GM (2007). Long-term outcomes in children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 40 (8): 741–6.
  50. "Childhood Cancer Survivors Face Increased Sarcoma Risk", HealthDay News, February 21, 2007
  51. Oeffinger et al., "Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer", New England Journal of Medicine, October 12, 2006
  52. Long-term Outcomes in Survivors of Neuroblastoma: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study -- Laverdière et al., 10.1093/jnci/djp230 -- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
  53. Janoueix-Lerosey I, Schleiermacher G, Michels E, et al. (March 2009). Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 27 (7): 1026–33.
  54. Michels, E; Vandesompele, J; Hoebeeck, J; Menten, B; De Preter, K; Laureys, G; Van Roy, N; Speleman, F. Genome wide measurement of DNA copy number changes in neuroblastoma: dissecting amplicons and mapping losses, gains and breakpoints. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;115:273–282. doi: 10.1159/000095924. [PubMed]
  55. Carén H, Erichsen J, Olsson L, Enerbäck C, Sjöberg RM, Abrahamsson J, Kogner P, Martinsson T. High-resolution array copy number analyses for detection of deletion, gain, amplification and copy-neutral LOH in primary neuroblastoma tumors: four cases of homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A gene. BMC Genomics. 2008 Jul 29;9:353.
  56. Brodeur GM, Castleberry RP. Neuroblastoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG. Principles and practice of pediatric oncology, 3rd ed. 1997:761-797.
  57. Franks LM, Bollen A, Seeger RC, Stram DO, Matthay KK (1997). Neuroblastoma in adults and adolescents: an indolent course with poor survival. Cancer 79 (10): 2028–35.
  58. Ladenstein R, Pötschger U, Hartman O, et al. (June 2008). 28 years of high-dose therapy and SCT for neuroblastoma in Europe: lessons from more than 4000 procedures. Bone Marrow Transplant. 41 Suppl 2: S118–27.
  59. Cheung, Nai-Kong (2005). Neuroblastoma, Springer-Verlag.
  60. In Situ Neuroblastomas: a Contribution to the Natural History of Neural Crest Tumors.
  61. Rothenberg AB, Berdon WE, D'Angio GJ, Yamashiro DJ, Cowles RA (February 2009). Neuroblastoma-remembering the three physicians who described it a century ago: James Homer Wright, William Pepper, and Robert Hutchison. Pediatr Radiol 39 (2): 155–60.
  62. Neuroblastoma Committee - Current Focus of Research. URL accessed on 2008-01-13.
  63. A phase III trial of biologically-based therapy reduction for intermediate risk neuroblastoma -- Baker et al. 25 (18 Supplement): 9504 -- ASCO Meeting Abstracts.
  64. Pritchard J, Cotterill SJ, Germond SM, Imeson J, de Kraker J, Jones DR (2005). High dose melphalan in the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma: results of a randomised trial (ENSG-1) by the European Neuroblastoma Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 44 (4): 348–57.
  65. Pearson AD, Pinkerton CR, Lewis IJ, Imeson J, Ellershaw C, Machin D (2008). High-dose rapid and standard induction chemotherapy for patients aged over 1 year with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 9 (3): 247–256.
  66. Matthay KK, Villablanca JG, Seeger RC, et al. (Oct 1999). Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Children's Cancer Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 341 (16): 1165–73.
  67. Matthay KK, Reynolds CP, Seeger RC, et al. (March 2009). Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. J. Clin. Oncol. 27 (7): 1007–13.
  68. Berthold F, Boos J, Burdach S, et al. (Sep 2005). Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 6 (9): 649–58.
  69. [ Clinical Trials (PDQ�) - National Cancer Institute]. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  70. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Neuroblastoma. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  71. Clinical Trials - National Cancer Institute. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  72. Consolidation Treatment With Chimeric Anti-GD2-Antibody ch14.18 in Children Older Than 1 Year With Metastatic Neuroblastoma -- Simon et al. 22 (17): 3549 -- Journal of Clinical Oncology. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  73. NCI Cancer Bulletin for May 19, 2009 - National Cancer Institute.
  74. Neuroblastoma Education Book. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  75. [ Clinical Trials (PDQ�) - National Cancer Institute]. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  76. NB2004 - kinder krebs info . de. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  77. [ Clinical Trials (PDQ�) - National Cancer Institute]. URL accessed on 2008-02-19.
  78. George RE, Li S, Medeiros-Nancarrow C, et al. (Jun 2006). High-risk neuroblastoma treated with tandem autologous peripheral-blood stem cell-supported transplantation: long-term survival update. J. Clin. Oncol. 24 (18): 2891–6.
  79. Texas Children's Cancer Center - Clinical Trials - PEPI: Protracted Etoposide In a Phase II Upfront Window for Induction Therapy for High Risk Neuroblastoma. URL accessed on 2008-02-19.
  80. Neuroblastoma Protocol 2005: Therapy for Children with Advanced Stage High-Risk Neuroblastoma. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  81. Neuroblastoma Protocol 2008: Therapy for Children With Advanced Stage High Risk Neuroblastoma - Full Text View -
  82. Sloan-Kettering - Neuroblastoma: Our Clinical Trials. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  83. Xue C, Haber M, Flemming C, et al. (2007). p53 determines multidrug sensitivity of childhood neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 67 (21): 10351–60.
  84. Recurrent neuroblastoma: Randomized treatment with topotecan + cyclophosphamide (T+C) vs. topotecan alone(T). A POG/CCG Intergroup Study -- Frantz et al. 22 (14 Supplement): 8512 -- ASCO Meeting Abstracts. URL accessed on 2008-03-13.
  85. Irinotecan Plus Temozolomide for Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma -- Kushner et al. 24 (33): 5271 -- Journal of Clinical Oncology. URL accessed on 2008-03-13.
  86. Phase I study of oral irinotecan and temozolomide in children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: A New Approach to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) Consortium study -- Wagner et al. 25 (18 Supplement): 9567 -- ASCO Meeting Abstracts. URL accessed on 2008-03-13.
  87. "DRAXIS Radiopharmaceutical Unit Approved to Run 2 Clinical Trials to Treat Neuroblastoma", DRAXIS Health Inc. press release, November 22, 2006
  88. Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Initiates Phase 2a Azedra(TM) Clinical Trial in Neuroblastoma Patients.
  89. Molecular Insight Pharmaceuticals : Azedra Trials.
  90. Iodine I 131 Metaiodobenzylguanidine and a Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Young Patients With Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma - Full Text View -
  91. NANT Home Page. URL accessed on 2008-02-02.
  92. "Painkiller Helps Against Child Cancer",, February 8, 2007, accessed March 8, 2007 (source apparently is a press release from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden)
  93. Celecoxib Prevents Neuroblastoma Tumor Development and Potentiates the Effect of Chemotherapeutic Drugs In vitro and In vivo -- Ponthan et al. 13 (3): 1036 -- Clinical Cancer Research.
  94. Van Maerken T, Ferdinande L, Taildeman J, et al. (November 2009). Antitumor Activity of the Selective MDM2 Antagonist Nutlin-3 Against Chemoresistant Neuroblastoma With Wild-Type p53. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101 (22): 1562–1574.

External links[edit | edit source]

Template:Endocrine gland neoplasia

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.