Assessment | Biopsychology | Comparative | Cognitive | Developmental | Language | Individual differences | Personality | Philosophy | Social |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |

Clinical: Approaches · Group therapy · Techniques · Types of problem · Areas of specialism · Taxonomies · Therapeutic issues · Modes of delivery · Model translation project · Personal experiences ·

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome
Classification and external resources

Detailed view of a neuromuscular junction:
1. Presynaptic terminal
2. Sarcolemma
3. Synaptic vesicle
4. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
5. Mitochondrion
ICD-10 G731
ICD-9 358.1
DiseasesDB 4030
MedlinePlus 000710
eMedicine neuro/181 emerg/292
MeSH D015624

Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS Lambert-Eaton syndrome or Eaton–Lambert syndrome) is a rare autoimmune disorder that is characterised by muscle weakness of the limbs. It is the result of an autoimmune reaction in which antibodies are formed against presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels, and likely other nerve terminal proteins, in the neuromuscular junction (the connection between nerves and the muscle that they supply).[1] Around 60% of those with LEMS have an underlying malignancy, most commonly small cell lung cancer; it is therefore regarded as a paraneoplastic syndrome (a condition that arises as a result of cancer elsewhere in the body).[2]

People who develop LEMS are usually over 40, although it may occur at any age. The diagnosis is usually confirmed with electromyography and blood tests; these also distinguish it from myasthenia gravis (MG), a related autoimmune neuromuscular disease.[1]

If the disease is associated with cancer, direct treatment of the cancer often relieves the symptoms of LEMS. Other treatments often used are steroids, azathioprine and intravenous immunoglobulin, which suppress the immune system, and pyridostigmine and 3,4-diaminopyridine, which enhance the neuromuscular transmission. Occasionally, plasma exchange is required to remove the antibodies.[1]

Signs and symptoms[edit | edit source]

The weakness of LEMS typically involves the legs and arms. Leg involvement is more striking than in myasthenia gravis. The proximal muscles (those closest to the trunk) are predominantly affected; this leads to difficulties climbing stairs and rising from a sitting position. Physical exercise and high temperatures can worsen the symptoms. Weakness of the bulbar muscles (supplying the mouth and throat) is occasionally encountered.[1] Weakness of the eye muscles is uncommon. Some may have double vision, drooping of the eyelids and difficulty swallowing,[1] but generally only together with leg weakness; this distinguishes LEMS from myasthenia gravis, in which eye signs are much more prominent.[2] In the advanced stages of the disease, weakness of the respiratory muscles may occur.[1] Some may also experience problems with coordination (ataxia).[3]

Three quarters of people with LEMS also have disruption of the autonomic nervous system. This may be experienced as a dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, impaired sweating, and orthostatic hypotension (falls in blood pressure on standing, potentially leading to blackouts). Some report a metallic taste in the mouth.[1]

On neurological examination, the weakness demonstrated with normal testing of power is often less severe than would be expected on the basis of the symptoms. Strength improves further with repeated testing, e.g. improvement of power on repeated hand grip (a phenomenon known as "Lambert's sign"). At rest, reflexes are typically reduced; with muscle use, reflex strength increases. This is a characteristic feature of LEMS. The pupillary light reflex may be sluggish.[1]

In LEMS associated with lung cancer, most have no suggestive symptoms of cancer at the time, such as cough, coughing blood and unintentional weight loss.[2] It has been suggested that LEMS associated with lung cancer is more severe.[3]

Causes[edit | edit source]

LEMS is often associated with lung cancer (50–70%),[1] making LEMS a paraneoplastic syndrome.[3] Of the people with small cell lung cancer, 1–3% have LEMS.[2] In most of these cases, LEMS is the first symptom of the lung cancer, and it is otherwise asymptomatic.[2]

LEMS may also be associated with autoimmune diseases, such as hypothyroidism (an underactive thyroid gland) or diabetes mellitus type 1.[1][4] Myasthenia gravis, too, may happen in the presence of tumors (thymoma, a tumor of the thymus in the chest); people with MG without a tumor and people with LEMS without a tumor have similar genetic variations that seem to predispose them to these diseases.[2] HLA-DR3-B8 (an HLA subtype), in particular, seems to predispose to LEMS.[4]

Mechanism[edit | edit source]

In normal neuromuscular function, a nerve impulse is carried down the axon (the long projection of a nerve cell) from the spinal cord. At the nerve ending in the neuromuscular junction, where the impulse is transferred to the muscle cell, the nerve impulse leads to the opening of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCC), the influx of calcium ions into the nerve terminal, and the calcium-dependent triggering of synaptic vesicle fusion with plasma membrane. Since these synaptic vesicles contain acetylcholine, it is released into the synaptic cleft and stimulates the acetylcholine receptor on the muscle. The muscle then contracts. [1]

In LEMS, antibodies against VGCC, particularly the P/Q-type VGCC, decrease the amount of calcium that can enter the nerve ending, hence less acetylcholine can be released from the neuromuscular junction. Apart from skeletal muscle, the autonomic nervous system also requires acetylcholine neurotransmission; this explains the occurrence of autonomic symptoms in LEMS.[1][2] P/Q voltage-gated calcium channels are also found in the cerebellum, explaining why some experience problems with coordination.[3][4] The antibodies bind particularly to the part of the receptor known as the "domain III S5–S6 linker peptide".[4] Antibodies may also bind other VGCCs.[4] Some have patients have antibodies that bind synaptotagmin, the protein sensor for calcium-regulated vesicle fusion.[4] Many people with LEMS, both with and without VGCC antibodies, have detectable antibodies against the M1 subtype of the acetylcholine receptor; it is thought that their presence participates in a lack of compensation for the weak calcium influx.[4]

Apart from the decreased calcium influx, there is also a disruption of active zone vesicle release sites, which is also thought to be antibody-dependent since LEMS patients have antibodies to components of these active zones (including voltage-dependent calcium channels). Together, these abnormalities lead to the decrease in muscle contractility. Repeated stimuli over a period of about 10 seconds eventually lead to sufficient delivery of calcium, and an increase in muscle contraction to normal levels, which can be demonstrated on electromyography by increasing amplitude of repeated compound muscle action potentials.[1]

It has been shown that the antibodies found in LEMS associated with lung cancer also bind to calcium channels in the cancer cells, and it is presumed that the antibodies originally develop as a reaction to these cells.[1] It has been suggested that the immune reaction to the cancer cells suppresses their growth and improves the prognosis from the cancer.[2][4]

Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

File:Thorax pa peripheres Bronchialcarcinom li OF markiert.jpg

Chest X-ray showing a tumor in the left lung (right side of the image)

The diagnosis is usually made on electromyography (EMG), which is one of the standard tests in the investigation of otherwise unexplained muscle weakness. This involves the insertion of small needles into the nerves supplying several muscles, administering small electrical impulses through these needles, and measuring the electrical response of the muscle in question. Two EMG investigations can be characteristic in LEMS: compound motor action potentials (CMAP) and single-fiber examination.[1]

CMAP shows small amplitudes but normal latency and conduction velocities. If repeated impulses are administered (two per second or 2 Hz), it is normal for CMAP amplitudes to become smaller as the acetylcholine in the motor end plate is depleted. In LEMS, this decrease is larger than observed normally. Eventually, stored acetylcholine is made available, and the amplitudes increase again. In LEMS this remains insufficient to reach a level sufficient for transmission of an impulse from nerve to muscle; all can be attributed to insufficient calcium in the nerve terminal. A similar pattern is witnessed in myasthenia gravis. In LEMS, in response to exercising the muscle, the CMAP amplitude increases greatly (over 200%, often much more). This also occurs on the administration of a rapid burst of electrical stimuli (20 impulses per second for ten seconds). This is attributed to the influx of calcium in response to these stimuli.[1][2] On single-fiber examination, features may include increased jitter (seen in other diseases of neuromuscular transmission) and blocking.[1]

Blood tests may be performed to exclude other causes of muscle disease (elevated creatine kinase may indicate a myositis, and abnormal thyroid function tests may indicate thyrotoxic myopathy). Antibodies against voltage-gated calcium channels can be identified in 85% of people with EMG confirmed LEMS.[1] Once LEMS is diagnosed, investigations such as a CT scan of the chest are usually performed to identify any possible underlying lung tumors. 50–60% of these are discovered immediately after the diagnosis of LEMS. The remainder is diagnosed later, but usually within two years and typically within four years.[2] As a result, scans are typically repeated every six months for the first two years after diagnosis.[1] While CT of the lungs is usually adequate, a positron emission tomography (PET) scan of the body may also be performed to search for an occult tumour, particularly of the lung.[5]

Treatment[edit | edit source]


Molecular structure of 3,4-diaminopyridine, a commonly used drug treatment for LEMS.

If LEMS is caused by an underlying cancer, treatment of the malignancy usually leads to resolution of the symptoms.[1] Treatment usually consists of chemotherapy, with radiation therapy in those with limited disease.[2]

The three treatment modalities aimed at improving LEMS symptoms directly are improving the neuromuscular conduction and suppression of the immune system. Two classes of medication are used to improve neuromuscular transmission. Pyridostigmine decreases the degradation of acetylcholine after release into the synaptic cleft, and thereby improves muscle contraction. In LEMS, the potassium channel blocker 3,4-diaminopyridine (amifampridine) is also used. It delays the repolarization of nerve terminals after a discharge, thereby allowing more calcium to accumulate in the nerve terminal.[1][2] An older agent, guanidine, causes many side-effects and is not recommended. 4-Aminopyridine (dalfampridine), an agent related to 3,4-aminopyridine, causes more side-effects than 3,4-DAP and is also not recommended.[2]

Immune suppression tends to be less effective than in other autoimmune diseases. Prednisolone (a glucocorticoid or steroid) suppresses the immune response, and the steroid-sparing agent azathioprine may replace it once therapeutic effect has been achieved. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be used with a degree of effectiveness. Plasma exchange (or plasmapheresis), the removal of plasma proteins such as antibodies and replacement with normal plasma, may provide improvement in acute severe weakness. Again, plasma exchange is less effective than in other related conditions such as myasthenia gravis, and additional immunosuppressive medication is often needed.[1] According to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration, the best evidence in the treatment of LEMS exists for 3,4-aminopyridine and IVIG.[6]

History[edit | edit source]

Anderson and colleagues from St Thomas' Hospital, London, were the first to mention a case with possible clinical findings of LEMS in 1953,[7] but Lambert, Eaton and Rooke at the Mayo Clinic were the first physicians to substantially describe the clinical and electrophysiological findings of the disease in 1956.[8][9] In 1972, the clustering of LEMS with other autoimmune diseases led to the hypothesis that it was caused by autoimmunity.[10] Studies in the 1980s confirmed the autoimmune nature,[4] and research in the 1990s demonstrated the link with antibodies against P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels.[1][11]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22 Mareska M, Gutmann L (June 2004). Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Semin. Neurol. 24 (2): 149–53.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Verschuuren JJ, Wirtz PW, Titulaer MJ, Willems LN, van Gerven J (July 2006). Available treatment options for the management of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 7 (10): 1323–36.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Rees JH (June 2004). Paraneoplastic syndromes: when to suspect, how to confirm, and how to manage. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 75 Suppl 2 (Suppl 2): ii43–50.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Takamori M (September 2008). Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: search for alternative autoimmune targets and possible compensatory mechanisms based on presynaptic calcium homeostasis. J. Neuroimmunol. 201-202: 145–52.
  5. Ropper AH, Brown RH (2005). "53" Ropper AH, Brown RH Adams and Victor's Principles of Neurology, 8th, 1261, New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
  6. Maddison P, Newsom-Davis J (2005). Treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2): CD003279.
  7. Anderson HJ, Churchill-Davidson HC, Richardson AT (December 1953). Bronchial neoplasm with myasthenia; prolonged apnoea after administration of succinylcholine. Lancet 265 (6799): 1291–3.
  8. Who Named It synd/2738
  9. Lambert EH, Eaton LM, Rooke ED (1956). Defect of neuromuscular conduction associated with malignant neoplasms. Am. J. Physiol. 187: 612–613.
  10. Gutmann L, Crosby TW, Takamori M, Martin JD (September 1972). The Eaton-Lambert syndrome and autoimmune disorders. Am. J. Med. 53 (3): 354–6.
  11. Motomura M, Hamasaki S, Nakane S, Fukuda T, Nakao YK (August 2000). Apheresis treatment in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Ther. Apher. 4 (4): 287–90.

|} Template:Paraneoplastic syndromes

This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.