Assessment |
Biopsychology |
Comparative |
Cognitive |
Developmental |
Language |
Individual differences |
Personality |
Philosophy |
Social |
Methods |
Statistics |
Clinical |
Educational |
Industrial |
Professional items |
World psychology |
Cognitive Psychology: Attention · Decision making · Learning · Judgement · Memory · Motivation · Perception · Reasoning · Thinking - Cognitive processes Cognition - Outline Index
The Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion, also known as the Craik-Cornsweet illusion or just the Cornsweet illusion, is an optical illusion that was described in detail by Tom Cornsweet in the late 1960s. Craik and O'Brien had made earlier observations in a similar vein.
In the image above, the entire region to the right of the "edge" in the middle looks slightly lighter than the area to the left of the edge, but in fact the brightness of both areas is exactly the same, as can be seen by blacking out the region containing the edge:
The following image shows the actual distribution of luminance in the picture, and the typical perception of luminance.
This phenomenon is similar to the familiar phenomenon of simultaneous contrast and Mach bands, but differs from it in two important respects.
- In Mach bands the effect is seen only on areas that are close to the intensity gradient. In Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion, a very small area (the central "edge") affects the perception of entire large areas, portions of which are distant from the edge.
- In the Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion, the region adjacent to the light part of the edge appears lighter, and the region adjacent to the dark part of the edge appears darker, just the opposite of the usual contrast effects.
The images above show the usual presentation of the effect. A far more convincing and dramatic version of the effect can be seen in Purves, Lotto, and Nundy (2002) where it is presented within a quasi-realistic image of solid, illuminated objects. These writers give a (teleological) explanation of this and other illusions, in which the visual system and brain are posited to generate percepts on an empirical basis that is much like a reflex. In their words, "[perception] accords not with the features of the retinal stimulus or the properties of the underlying objects, but with what the same or similar stimuli have typically signified" in the past.".
References[]
- Cornsweet T (1970) Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press.
- Purves D, Lotto RB (2003) Why We See What We Do: An Empirical Theory of Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
- Purves D, Lotto RB (2004) The Cornsweet effect. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, 3rd edition Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
- Purves D, Lotto RB, Nundy S (2002)Why We See What We Do American Scientist 90(3):236-243.
- Purves D, Shimpi A, Lotto RB (1999) An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect. J. Neurosci. 19:8542-8551.
See also[]
External links[]
- Purves, Dale, R. Beau Lotto, Surajit Nundy, Why We See What We Do, American Scientist, (): (entire article)
- Dramatic image from Purves, Lotto, and Nundy showing a much more convincing presentation of the Cornsweet illusion
| This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors). |