Individual differences |
Methods | Statistics | Clinical | Educational | Industrial | Professional items | World psychology |
Cognitive therapy and its variants traditionally identify ten cognitive distortions that maintain negative thinking and help to maintain negative emotions. Eliminating these distortions and negative thought is said to improve mood and discourage maladies such as depression and chronic anxiety. The process of learning to refute these distortions is called "cognitive restructuring".
List[edit | edit source]
Related links are suggested in parentheses:
- All-or-nothing thinking - thinking of things in absolute terms, like "always", "every" or "never". Few aspects of human behavior are so absolute. (See false dilemma).
- Overgeneralization - taking isolated cases and using them to make wide, usually self-deprecating generalizations. (See hasty generalization).
- Mental filter - Focusing exclusively on certain, usually negative or upsetting, aspects of something while ignoring the rest, like a tiny imperfection in a piece of clothing. (See misleading vividness).
- Disqualifying the positive - continually "shooting down" positive experiences for arbitrary, ad hoc reasons. (See special pleading).
- Jumping to conclusions - assuming something negative where there is actually no evidence to support it. Two specific subtypes are also identified:
- Mind reading - assuming the intentions of others
- Fortune telling - guessing that things will turn out badly. (See slippery slope).
- Magnification and Minimization - exaggerating negatives and understating positives. Often the positive characteristics of other people are exaggerated and negatives understated. There is one subtype of magnification:
- Catastrophizing - focusing on the worst possible outcome, however unlikely, or thinking that a situation is unbearable or impossible when it is really just uncomfortable.
- Emotional reasoning - making decisions and arguments based on how you feel rather than objective reality. (See appeal to consequences).
- Making should statements - concentrating on what you think "should" or ought to be rather than the actual situation you are faced with, or having rigid rules which you think should always apply no matter what the circumstances are. (See wishful thinking).
- Labelling - related to overgeneralization, explaining by naming. Rather than describing the specific behavior, you assign a label to someone or yourself that puts them in absolute and unalterable terms.
- Personalization (or attribution) - Assuming you directly caused things when that may not have been the case. (See illusion of control).
- Fairness Fallacy - Expecting life to be fair is a cognitive distortion since, unfortunately, life is often not fair. 
- Karma Fallacy - Similar to the fairness fallacy, the karma fallacy is the belief that people will get what they deserve. A belief that karma will level the playing field in short order is a cognitive distortion. This is sometimes called the heaven's reward fallacy.
- Fallacy of change - There are two parts to this: one is that by manipulating others, we can change them. The others is that by changing others, we can become happy. 
- Always being right - In this cognitive distortion being right is more important than anything else including other people’s feelings.
- Blaming - This distortion is the flip side of personalization. Instead of feeling that one is responsible for everything, one blames others for everything that happens.
See also[edit | edit source]
[edit | edit source]
|This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).|
- Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs named