Forum:Relevant content & interwiki links

I'm working with Dr. Kiff to make computer-related articles relevant to psychology, and I was going to tackle content copied directly from Wikipedia. However, this is a huge rewriting task which I wouldn't expect of someone intimately familiar with the involved topics (which, for the most part, I'm not), and indeed most of those articles are completely unchanged except for the stripping of redlinks. Therefore, I propose (yes, as a foreigner) that you
 * 1) Completely strip these articles of irrelevant content except the most basic pieces (like the definition).  This will go a long way to relieve your current writer's block.
 * 2) Expand them based on both personal knowledge and outside sources (of which Wikipedia is a great repository), perhaps even with ideas taken from Wikipedia.  But this expansion should be strictly psychological, or building up to psychological conclusions.
 * 3) Delete all articles which have no psychological content (but permit their re-creation).
 * 4) Apply this section to the remaining articles as a preventative measure against creating irrelevant articles.  This also serves as a favor to both your users and the other wikis, because they want to find each other.
 * 5) Perpetually repeat these steps.

I would be happy to further discuss my reasoning behind these recommendations. Note that I don't constrain their scope to computer-related articles.

As a side note, I would appreciate any feedback on Wikia:Interwiki Integration, which I linked to above. A friend told me the language is intimidating and a bit confusing, and the contract's stiffness (i.e., you're in or you're not) unappealing. Second (and third, fourth...) opinions are always good, so please give yours. This forum probably isn't the best place to discuss this, so I further invite you to the dedicated talk page. --Jesdisciple (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)